Skip to product information
1 of 14

Peyton Dress 100% Cotton Gauze

Peyton Dress 100% Cotton Gauze

Regular price $79.99 USD
Regular price Sale price $79.99 USD
Sale Sold out
Taxes included. Shipping calculated at checkout.
Size
Color

Low stock: 2 left

Quantity

A shortened version of the Kristy dress, the Peyton is sleeveless with a v-neckline and slight flare bottom

Sizes: 0 (XS/S), 1 (S/M), 2 (L/XL), 3 (2X/3X), 4 (4X/5X)

Size

0

1

2

3

Bust

31"

38"

46"

50"

Length

32"

32"

34"

34"

Hip

38"

42"

50"

54"

 

Styling Tips & Outfit Ideas

  • Day to Night: Pair this dress with clean white sneakers and a denim jacket for casual daytime outings, or elevate with block heels and delicate jewelry for an evening look.
  • Layering: Elevate the silhouette by layering with a tailored blazer or lightweight knit cardigan during cooler evenings.
  • Accessories: Complete the ensemble with a structured shoulder bag and minimalist gold or silver accents.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the fit and sizing of the Peyton Dress 100% Cotton Gauze?
A: The Peyton Dress 100% Cotton Gauze runs true to size. Please refer to our detailed size chart above (S/M/L) to find your perfect measurements.

Q: What occasions are suitable for this dress?
A: The Peyton Dress 100% Cotton Gauze is designed for versatile everyday styling. Depending on the occasion, it can easily be dressed up with layers or worn as a relaxed statement piece.

Q: What is the return policy for the Peyton Dress 100% Cotton Gauze?
A: We offer a 7-day return policy for the Peyton Dress 100% Cotton Gauze to ensure you are completely satisfied with your purchase.

Explore Related Collections
View full details
★ Shop App Verified Reviews

Loved by Shoppers Across the US

★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ 4.3 / 5.0 Rating (Verified Shopper Feedback)
Plisse Lettuce Hem Blouse
CINNAMON / S
★ ★ ★ ★ ★

“Love it. Striking color and I look great in it. Fit well”

Wanderlust Grey Handbags
Grey / 1
★ ★ ★ ★ ★

“Good equipment and nice bag”

Tiger Sequin Patch T Shirt
Charcoal / L
★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆

“expected it to be better quality”